Wednesday, June 15, 2005

The Implications of Brazilian Disclosure: Part One

First, I want to apologize for my recent lapse in activity (is anyone still listening?). Schoolwork demanded my attention until only a few days ago, and I am now at my parents' house in suburban Ohio. Let's hope I have more time and energy for this blog during these summer days.

On 19 May 2005, A. J. Gevaerd, editor of Revista Brasileira de Ufologia (Brazilian UFO Magazine) and head of the CBU, Comissão Brasileira de Ufólogos (Brazilian Committee of UFO Researchers), sent a brief note to UFO UpDates. It begins:

Dear colleagues of the international UFO community:

This is a very short note to let you know that the Brazilian Government, through the Brazilian Air Force (FAB), will finally do its formal official UFO disclosure, tomorrow, May 20. The disclosure is the direct result of the intense pressure by UFOs: Freedom of Information Now, the campaign started by the Brazilian UFO Magazine in April 2004, and co-ordinated by me. It has been a long year of much work for us to reach this point.
It's unsurprising that no one in my university dorm, in any of my classes, or in my family eventually heard about the 20 May disclosure event in Brazil. Popular American media did not report on it, and only select independent sources (mostly UFO-related) discussed the event.

But make no mistake about it: Brazil is now among a handful of countries, including Mexico and Belgium, which has officially acknowledged the validity of the UFO phenomenon. 20 May 2005 is a historic day in global ufology.

This is part one of a three-part series on Brazilian disclosure and its implications for American ufology. Part one analyses the Brazilian Ufology Manifesto presented by the CBU to the Commander of the Brazilian Air Force. Part two examines the conditions for disclosure that prompted the Brazilian Government and Air Force to agree to disclosure. Part three determines whether such conditions can be duplicated to any degree in countries without disclosure, most notably the United States.

The Ufologist's Party: the Brazilian Ufology Manifesto

The Brazilian Ufology Manifesto was presented by six ufologists--A. J. Gevaerd (coordinator), Claudeir Covo, Marco Antonio Petit, Rafael Cury, Reginaldo de Athayde, and Fernando de Aragao Ramalho--to the Commander of the Brazilian Air Force, Air Brigadier Luis Carlos da Silva Bueno on 20 May 2005 in Brasília, the Federal Capital of Brazil. It seems to be the unifying document representing the collective efforts of Brazilian ufologists, establishing an ufological state of affairs--a "what we know" kind of declaration--recommending official policy action, and requesting files on at least three Brazilian cases. For these reasons, I have chosen to break it down, review it, and determine its potential application to American ufology.

The manifesto begins:
The Brazilian Ufological Community, represented by individual ufologists as well as by research groups, investigators, scholars, and people interested in Ufology who undersigned the document prepared for this purpose, expresses its opinion by means of this document prepared under the coordination of Revista UFO in order to address Brazilian authorities represented herein by the eminent President of Brazil and the eminent Commander of the Air Force, to present the following:
The first noteworthy element of this paragraph is the phrase "Brazilian Ufological Community", a phrase which seems (I can't say for sure) to suggest a somewhat unified collective of ufologists. I doubt any American ufologist is capable of, let alone comfortable with, arguing for an "American Ufological Community". The intra-field division and animosity prevents any such "Community" from emerging. Orthodox UFO researchers who dismiss exopolitics are one potential--albeit inconsistent still--community, while exopoliticians comprise another. Questions of government involvement, document authenticity, and research priority separate us. Do these issues not divide Brazilian ufologists, or is their community small enough that such issues can be handled collectively and appropriately without causing splinter groups?

Regardless of the size, the Brazilian Ufological Community, as the above paragraph says, includes "research groups, investigators, [and] scholars". Could we envision an American Ufological Community comprised of MUFON, CUFOS, Stanton Friedman, Richard Dolan, and Michio Kaku? Either Brazilian ufologists are simply more cooperative or they are not dealing with the same issues as American ufologists. Nevertheless, the confidence with which the undersigned researchers are able to present their manifesto is admirable and worth considering as a characteristic of their national community.

The first point of the manifesto states:
(1) It is widely known that the UFO Phenomenon, noticed with the constant visits of spacecraft to our planet Earth, is genuine, real, and consistent, and so is independently confirmed by civil ufologists, as well as by military authorities worldwide for more than 50 years.
As a foundational assertion, this statement will be disputed by many ufologists for its conclusion that "the UFO Phenomenon" is synonymous with "constant visits of spacecraft to our planet Earth". Arguably, no one has proven that any UFO sightings or cases in history have been material vehicles--although many argue that enough evidence exists to support this conclusion. What is indisputable about this first statement is the UFO phenomenon as "real, consistent, and independently confirmed by civil ufologists, as well as by military authorities worldwide for more than 50 years." The phenomenon is indeed "real", evidenced by the ever-growing archive of sightings.

The second point states:
(2) The Phenomenon had already had its origin sufficiently identified as far from our planetary borders. The spacecraft which so insistently visit our planet come from other civilizations, perhaps technologically more advanced than ours, and inhabit the same universe we do, although we do not know their worlds and origins.
This second assertion continues to carry the previous statement/assumption that at least some UFOs are spacecraft from beyond our planet, and that these craft are "perhaps technologically more advanced than ours". It is a common claim that ET craft would have to be more advanced than any craft currently in production by any nation on earth; how else could such beings travel from their solar system to ours? Therefore, it is plausible to state that, if some UFOs are ET-piloted vehicles, then these craft are more advanced than any known craft on earth. Nevertheless, as the above point says, these "spacecraft", if they prove to be vehicles, do "inhabit the same universe we do, although we do not know their worlds and origins." Whether this second point continues the same problematic conclusion as the first depends on which ufologist you ask. Stanton Friedman has concluded that "SOME UFOs are alien spacecraft" but Paul Kimball has not (right, Paul?).

Point three states:
(3) Such civilizations are in a clear and unquestionable process of continuous approach to Earth and to our planetary society and, by acting this way in its maneuvers and activities, in most cases do not show any hostility to us.
This third statement, following the logic of the previous two, depends on the accuracy of the notion that at least some UFOs are ET-piloted craft. If at least some UFOs are indeed ET vehicles, then it is logical to say that such beings are engaged in an "unquestionable process of continuous approach to Earth"; the history of sightings and encounters, if nothing else, proves the consistency, the "continuous approach", of the UFO phenomenon. Furthermore, if some UFOs are ET-piloted, then it stands to reason that they could, if armed, attack human society and, if the folklore is at all accurate, re-assign us a new place in the food chain. However, the vast majority of UFO cases do not include any sign of hostility or animosity.

Point four states:
(4) It is clear that visits from such non-terrestrial
civilizations to our planet are gradually increasing over the last years, according to domestic and international statistics, both in number and intensity, consisting of something which requires legitimate attention.
Despite the current focus on high-profile cases like Roswell and MJ-12, UFO sightings continue to be reported and archived. The UFO phenomenon is by no means confined to 1947. It is a testament to American ufologists' determination and stubbornness that the same cases, for the most part, are rehashed year in and year out. Perhaps we need to organize a concerted effort behind arguments like Paul Kimball's "Will Ufology's 'Deep Throat' Please Step Forward?" and "Majestic 12 - R.I.P.". Why are such posts not the subject of discussion on UFO UpDates? Why can't we collectively discuss a single topic, exhaust our avenues and resources, and then move on to the next as a well-informed "Ufological Community"? Am I too idealistic or is everyone else too stubborn? Let's engage each other and not just ourselves. If every frequent UpDates visitor agreed to work on a single topic for one month, then I believe we might know something like progress in this complex field.

Point five states:
(5) Considering all this, the establishment of an official program for acknowledgement, information, research, and public disclosure of the subject is urgent, in order to clarify to all Brazilians the undeniable and ever increasing extraterrestrial presence in our planet Earth.
The question of whether an official government-sponsored UFO research program is the best approach to the study of UFOs is a difficult one to answer. Can an ufologist trust a national government and military to assist in the fair and accurate study of UFOs? In the United States, the government has been, if nothing else, less than cooperative in working with ufologists and releasing UFO files. That does not mean a possibility for government-civilian collaboration does not exist. It only means that we should be careful, and isn't that an ufological mantra anyway? Nevertheless, in the case of Brazil, the "establishment of an official program for acknowledgement, information, research, and public disclosure" is a compelling and encouraging development, one that will have to be carefully monitored to ensure productivity and honesty.

The next paragraph reads:
Thus, considering measures publicly adopted in different moments of our History by countries like Chile, Belgium, Spain, France, Uruguay, and China, which already acknowledged the seriousness and urgency of the problem, we respectfully recommend the Command of the Air Force of the Federative Republic of Brazil, or any of its bodies, from now on, to prepare an appropriate policy to discuss this issue in the necessary environments, formats, and levels.
It is strange to me that no effort has been made by "disclosure nations" to appeal to "non-disclosure nations". If additional countries continue to publicly and officially recognize the validity of the UFO phenomenon--as I believe they will--then it is (or at least should be) a matter of time before such countries address those nations which have yet to allow disclosure. Multiple national communities pressuring one national government is more productive than the scattered efforts of civilian ufologists under that one national government. If American ufologists cannot make disclosure happen in the States, then perhaps American ufologists AND the international community can make it happen. To ignore the achievements and techniques of other countries only reflects our egocentric approach to a phenomenon which is simply too complex to allow for international competition among civilian ufologists.

The next paragraph reads:
The Brazilian Ufological Community, in the name of all undersigned participants of the aforementioned document, with full support of the worldwide ufological community, wants to voluntarily offer its knowledge, efforts, and dedication in order to make this proposal a reality so that we have the immediate acknowledgement of the UFO Phenomenon.
Noteworthy about this paragraph are the words "with full support of the worldwide ufological community". I am hesitant to share the author's optimism towards a "worldwide ufological community". Yes, American ufologists communicate with British ufologists who communicate with Brazilian ufologists, but is there a global community surrounding the global subject of UFOs? Is such unity even possible? I am not suggesting a dismissal of nationalized UFO communities; obviously those are necessary to achieve, or to help achieve, the kind of disclosure Brazil is experiencing. However, the possibility for a global response from united national communities is certainly worth investigating. For all the disagreements regarding methodology, approach, knowledge, and content, one underlying fact remains the same: UFOs exist, in one form or another, and every ufologist, whether she considers herself a conventional document researcher, an exopolitician, or a proponent of cosmic consciousness, is seeking a similar fundamental truth: the nature of UFO existence.

The next paragraph reads:
Thus, as a foundation stone in this process, which is to be the symbol of a positive action from our authorities, the Brazilian Ufological Community respectfully asks the Command of the Air Force to disclose its files concerning at least three specific episodes, which are specifically significant about the presence of unidentified flying objects in our Territory:
I'm not informed enough to discuss the three cases mentioned by the authors of the manifesto, but I will say that their deployment of "three specific episodes" is an effective technique of information-gathering without saying, we want everything now. Furthermore, it is important to note, as the authors do, the symbolic value of official disclosure and recognition. If the majority of the public needs governmental or major media acknowledgement to deem something "true", then governmental disclosure of UFO files and recognition of the phenomenon's validity serve not only to advance the scientific study of UFOs but also to help remove the cultural stigma on the phenomenon and on those who research it.

The manifesto concludes with a brief description of each case mentioned by the authors: the "Operation Prato, carried out by the I Regional Air Command (COMAR) of Bel=E9m (PA), from September to December of 1977"; the "mass ufological wave [which] occurred in May 1986 over the states of Rio de Janeiro and Sao Paulo"; and the "Varginha Case, [which] happened in that city in the state of Minas Gerais on May 20th, 1996".

The final paragraph reads:
Being absolutely aware that Brazilian civil and military authorities have never neglected the situation which has been monitored with care and attention throughout last decades, and on behalf of the Brazilian National Security, we consider that the measures aforementioned are to establish the beginning of a prosperous and profitable partnership.
The question remains whether a "prosperous and profitable partnership" will emerge in the years to come, and whether such a relationship is possible in major non-disclosure countries such as the United States and England. However, what is clear is the collective efforts which were needed to start the disclosure process in Brazil. Is that kind of organization and cooperation possible among current American ufologists? Is disclosure even the goal?

In a 05 August 2004 post to UFO UpDates, Greg Boone writes:
Perhaps we need to reach out more. I know the lines are thin and resources sometimes scarce but I think if all the media folks from Noory to Bell to Rense to Errol and so forth teamed up and put that reach out there it would really be a blockbuster of a force to be reckoned with. It'd be a new news service like no other because it's what "the people" are interested in.

Strength in numbers.
In part two, I will examine, to the best of my ability, the conditions for Brazilian disclosure which were cultivated in the months prior to 20 May 2005.

brad.

62 Comments:

Blogger Paul Kimball said...

Brad:

Good to have you back in the blogosphere!

Paul

1:54 PM

 
Blogger RRRGroup said...

Brad...

A well-reasoned argument from you.

However, it seems to me that it would be an uphill battle to get those in control of the UFO community, or think they do, to accept such a cogent position as the one you extol here.

Rich Reynolds

10:14 PM

 
Blogger owendrab said...

Rich,

Is not the RRRGroup advocating a similar uphill battle? Is not The UFOC engaging in an uphill battle? Is not ufology itself an uphill battle?

How many RRRGroup posts call for different perspectives and urgent changes? Are not these posts calling for uphill battles?

10:55 PM

 
Blogger RRRGroup said...

Brad...

You would attempt to do battle with the barbarians using reason and high intelligence.

This is like trying to explain Einstein's Theory of Relativity to a chimpanzee.

I admire your ratiocination but the barbarians have got to be sacked on their terms while the true UFO study goes on in secret or private, as Jacques Vallee has demonstrated, as have others with whom we are in communication and union.

Rich

7:06 AM

 
Blogger owendrab said...

Rich,

Does this "true UFO study" exclude a person like Paul Kimball who does not agree with the UFOC method but is definitely not a barbarian?

More to come in an email to you...

brad.

7:43 AM

 
Blogger RRRGroup said...

Paul Kimball is an open-book kinda guy....what you see is what you get.

He's too honest and forthright to be secretive, and he is certainly no barbarian, but he knows who they are, and has confronted them.

We of the RRRGroup choose to throw rocks at the barbarians but not engage in wasteful colloquies with them.

This approach has brought us communion with others of a like mind.

Paul Kimball will eventually eschew total contact with these ignorant people, you can take that to the bank...

Rich

7:49 AM

 
Blogger Paul Kimball said...

Brad:

I just noticed the brief reference in your article asking whether I accept the conculsion that some UFOs are alien spacecraft. The answer, as you intimate, is no. There simply isn't enough evidence to support that conclusion. However, I DO accept the validity of the Extraterrestrial Hypothesis, which holds that one possible explanation for some UFO sightings is alien spacecraft. There is, as you realise, a big difference between the two positions.

Paul

6:13 PM

 
Blogger Paul Kimball said...

Brad / Rich:

I almost forgot - I don't necessarily disagree with the UFOC method, because I'm still not exactly sure what it is. However, if it is what I think it is, ie. the "Invisible College" approach, then I don't even disagree here - to each there own. I just prefer a more open approach.

Besides, who says I don't keep secrets? You don;t think all of my good material goes straight up at my blog, do you??

:-)

Paul

6:16 PM

 
Blogger RRRGroup said...

Paul:

Your secrets are only temporary.

We expect that you will enlighten the UFO community with whatever you discover or uncover, when you think the time is right.

And I know you won't cast pearls before swine, so the "secrets" will appear in a venue devoid of the UFO riff-raff.

RR

9:25 PM

 
Blogger owendrab said...

Paul,

Right... I agree that the ETH is one possibility, among many I suspect.

Re: the UFOC method... I can't say I'm certain it will "succeed" where other ufologists have failed, and I'm not even sure it is the best method. It feels very reactionary, and although one's environment often seems like justification for drastic change, I sometimes wonder if our criticism of current ufology is nothing more than self-indulgence. Even if that's true, is there anything wrong with that? I'm not sure yet.

But we'll see where the balls of light take us.

brad.

9:33 AM

 
Blogger RRRGroup said...

Brad"

Reactionary? Yes, indeed.

Self-indulgent? Perhaps.

But we're addressing newbies, and they have to know that some do not accept the slovely approach that has botched the UFO story since 1947.

We delineate the good guys, and we note the bad guys, and we have a history of ufological acumen to back us up.

(We don't just make this stuff up.)

If you're familiar with the history of change, whether it's the French Revolution or just a U.S. administration, you'd know that it's the reactionaries who bring it about -- for good or bad, depending upon the outcome and evolutionary ramifications so duly noted by Toynbee.

I suggest, again, Lecomte du Nouy's "Human Destiny" as a necessary read for anyone who embarks on enlightening the masses (and so-called elite).

Rich Reynolds

11:13 AM

 
Blogger owendrab said...

Rich,

I completely understand, and I acknowledge the role of the reactionary in society, and in this case, ufology. But as we react to existing conditions, we must remember to [1] remain loyal to the productive study of ufology and not to the unproductive ridicule of ufologists (ridicule, not disagreement) and [2] criticise ourselves to ensure our methods remain sound and fair.

As evidenced by many ufologists today, it's easy to lose course in this field. Diligent criticism and self-criticism keep us--and hopefully others--in check.

take care, brad.

1:07 PM

 
Blogger emily94ernest said...

Earn between $14.37 & $48.99 per resume writing sold, depending on the type of resume & your affiliate level. Resume Writing is our best-selling service. Click Here for more information.

12:02 AM

 
Blogger edprice14152455 said...

I really enjoyed your blog. This is a cool Website Check it out now by Clicking Here . I know that you will find this WebSite Very Interesting

6:24 PM

 
Blogger Dupa Jasia said...

.. .. ...

12:00 PM

 
Blogger alex said...

http://prieslar.info/?search=Agnieszka+Pachalko
http://prieslar.info/?search=termin+egzaminu+na+aplikacje
http://prieslar.info/?search=Maptek
http://prieslar.info/?search=Fotokomorka
http://prieslar.info/?search=horoskop
http://prieslar.info/?search=Exec+Shield

2:17 AM

 
Blogger alex said...

http://prieslar.info/?search=team+pentagram+gshock
http://prieslar.info/?search=Krzysztof+Jackowski+jasnowidz
http://prieslar.info/?search=gadu+gadu+emotikonki
http://prieslar.info/?search=dodatki+na+bloga+na+onecie
http://prieslar.info/?search=odbior+tvn
http://prieslar.info/?search=Stila

4:05 AM

 
Blogger alex said...

http://prieslar.info/?search=horoskop+dla+nastolatki
http://prieslar.info/?search=postkomunizm
http://prieslar.info/?search=gazeta+forum
http://prieslar.info/?search=cieplo
http://prieslar.info/?search=Fizyka+chemiczna
http://prieslar.info/?search=mod+cs+1.5

5:49 AM

 
Blogger alex said...

http://prieslar.info/?search=smallville+6x09
http://prieslar.info/?search=szkoly+plastyczne
http://prieslar.info/?search=angelina+jolie+tomb+rider
http://prieslar.info/?search=na+bloga+w+onecie
http://prieslar.info/?search=komunikacja+lokalna
http://prieslar.info/?search=blogoslawienstwo+aaronowe

8:35 AM

 
Blogger adam said...

Hello I just entered before I have to leave to the airport, it's been very nice to meet you, if you want here is the site I told you about where I type some stuff and make good money (I work from home): here it is

8:47 AM

 
Blogger bernard n. shull said...

i did a little research after you told me about your "thing", and if you want a way to make more money using your your blog you can enter this site: link. bye.

2:33 PM

 
Blogger 1023 said...

看看blog調整心情,又要來繼續工作,大家加油.........................

3:22 PM

 
Blogger try said...

人間好話,要如海綿遇水牢牢吸住 ..................................................

3:13 AM

 
Blogger tiktok said...

裸女愛愛無碼尋夢視訊聊天a漫a片a圖一夜情一葉情人妻激情情色寫真美女自拍辣妹自拍正妹自拍美女走光辣妹走光正妹走光脫衣秀脫衣走光色情自慰自拍成人全裸打炮打手槍打飛機巨乳巨奶女優大奶性交

11:30 PM

 
Blogger 幸雨 said...

大奶妹貼圖區0204性影片觀賞露點自拍淫婦女生如何自慰色情站成人笑話av激情網愛視訊美女淫蕩av成人色情電話辣妹視訊聊天性關係情色vcd自慰圖淫美成人論壇台灣色情論壇成人聊天室自拍裸女貼圖視訊成人免費a片影片av成人網成人色情色情台灣辣妹小穴太太陰毛色情訊息裸女自拍色情影片a片論壇性愛技巧美女脫胸罩情色天堂av寫真色情視訊聊天做愛視訊成人影片床上戲情色聊天網火辣情色台灣女優性愛秘笈台灣av女優手淫自慰影片

2:58 AM

 
Blogger v奎峰奎峰 said...

IT IS A VERY NICE SUGGESTION, THANK YOU LOTS! ........................................

6:07 AM

 
Blogger PierreJ_Goodell said...

廢話不多,祝你順心~^^........................................

6:47 PM

 
Blogger ToryB_He231147 said...

很用心的blog,推推哦 ........................................

7:40 AM

 
Blogger DesiraeF_Creech0709 said...

Actions speak louder than words. ....................................................

12:27 AM

 
Blogger 美書 said...

失意人前,勿談得意事;得意人前,勿談失意事。........................................

12:48 AM

 
Blogger 許柏信 said...

pleasure to find such a good artical! please keep update!! ........................................

4:25 PM

 
Blogger Anja021netteC_021Restrepo1 said...

天下沒有走不通的路,沒有克服不了的困難,沒有打不敗的敵人。........................................

10:48 AM

 
Blogger 雅婷 said...

亞洲東洋影片go2av 18美女成人網 UT視訊美女交友 A片 - A片-情色網 免費視訊聊天fairy 情人080百分百成人圖片 影音聊天fm358 美女交友artdab 熟女人影片 制服淫窟 嘟嘟情人色網 utshow 視訊聊天 獸皇影片分享區 104av成人音影城 後宮視訊交友 sex520貼片,日本av女優,色美眉,sex,成人 免費線上影片觀看 洪爺護士免費 aa 片 173liveshow 視訊美女 0401成人聊天室 utobe影片 hichannel免費影視 情色視訊影音聊天 人之初貼圖區 plus論壇玩美女人影音秀 85cc情人影城 UT影音視訊聊天室 援交友留言 avonline免費a片 85cc免費av影片 情色免費成人avdvd電影 A片-殺很大 檳榔西施摸奶圖片 成人情色,性愛自拍 亞洲藝人情人視訊網 fdz論壇 情人視訊網 d736 uthome 視訊聊天室 sex888入口情色小遊戲 後宮 視訊聊天 免費視訊辣妹情人視訊網 kk俱樂部wmti 無碼dvd一本道a片 視訊美女 視訊ggo 素人自拍et免費影片下載 hilive-免費視訊 a383girl影音 45avdvd免費影片 免費視訊聊天fm358

11:30 PM

 
Blogger 韋于倫成 said...

Cast not the first stone. ........................................

8:04 AM

 
Blogger 紫倫妍勳 said...

你不能左右天氣,但你可以改變心情..................................................

9:21 PM

 
Blogger 佩GailBohanan1蓉 said...

世間是非,要如水泥地般水過則乾。............................................................

4:29 AM

 
Blogger rlkris said...

好的部落格就要和好朋友分享--感謝分享.........................

8:40 PM

 
Blogger Kath黃rinA俊宇 said...

愛情是一種發明,需要不斷改良。只是,這種發明和其他發明不一樣,它沒有專利權,隨時會被人搶走。..................................................................

1:17 PM

 
Blogger 麗旺麗旺 said...

blog不錯唷~我會常常來看的~加油~!!

1:07 PM

 
Blogger 姿吟姿吟 said...

Poverty tries friends..................................................................                           

5:44 AM

 
Blogger 峻帆峻帆峻帆 said...

pleasure to find such a good artical! please keep update!!.................................................................

7:42 PM

 
Blogger 清鴻 said...

人有兩眼一舌,是為了觀察倍於說話的緣故。............................................................

5:18 AM

 
Blogger 向霖向霖 said...

如果成為一支火柴,也要點亮一個短暫的宇宙;如果是一隻烏鴉,也要叫疼閉塞的耳膜。.................................................................

1:52 AM

 
Blogger 陳韋夏陳韋夏益東富益東富 said...

很榮幸能到你的BLOG留言o^~^o..................................................................

8:24 AM

 
Blogger 姿柯瑩柯dgdd憶曾g智曾 said...

一個人就像一個分數,他的實際才能是分子,他對自己的評價是分母。分母越大,則分數的價值越小。..................................................

9:18 AM

 
Blogger tuckerdarrell翁tuckerdarrell怡婷 said...

好文章就值得回響,如果可以常常看到您的更新,應該是件很幸福的事情~~............................................................

8:31 PM

 
Blogger 亦妮亦妮 said...

量力而為,別勉強了,Cut your coat according to your cloth...................................................................

3:01 AM

 
Blogger 李志杰 said...

人要學習健忘,把所有不如意忘掉,才會快樂。..................................................

6:44 PM

 
Blogger 陳佑發 said...

來幫忙拼人氣~Go Go Go 時間可證明一切.................................................................

7:02 AM

 
Blogger 琬安琬安 said...

人生的價值以及他的快樂,都在於他有能力看重自己的生存................................................

2:08 AM

 
Blogger 蕭v柯凡豐珈火 said...

什麼樣的學習計畫並不重要,重要的是你是什麼樣的人。............................................................

10:48 PM

 
Blogger 家唐銘 said...

我們能互相給予的最佳禮物是「真心的關懷」。..................................................

1:17 AM

 
Blogger 文旺江汝 said...

時間就是塑造生命的材料。

3:28 AM

 
Blogger 家唐銘 said...

感謝大大的無私分享 讓小弟獲益良多 終於知道網上還有這麼多的好東西≧▽≦"
............................................................

11:52 PM

 
Blogger 灏群 said...

一個人的際遇在第一次總是最深刻的,有時候甚至會讓人的心變成永遠的絕緣。......................................................................

7:42 PM

 
Blogger 蔡曼鄭美玉屏 said...

所有的資產,在不被諒解時,都成了負債............................................................

2:54 AM

 
Blogger 王辛江淑萍康 said...

生命的意義,是在於活的充實;而不是在於活得長久。............................. ...................................

3:44 PM

 
Blogger 士文婷文婷松 said...

感覺很用心經營呢!鼓勵鼓勵............................................................

6:23 PM

 
Blogger 廷家祥家祥雯 said...

happy to read~ thank you!............................................................

6:24 PM

 
Blogger 群育航學 said...

精彩,thanks!............................................................

9:45 PM

 
Blogger  said...

婚姻對男人來說是賭他的自由,對女人而言卻是賭她的幸福。............................................................

3:37 AM

 
Blogger 偉DimpleHolloway043昀 said...

文章雖然普通,但意義卻很大~~^^~~ ..................................................

7:01 PM

 

Post a Comment

<< Home